内容摘要： 本文通过对20世纪前期陶然士与葛维汉对岷江上游地区羌民研究的比较分析，展现了早期传教士及人类学家对西南少数民族研究的具体状况，体现了当时两种不同的学术视野在西南的交集以及当东方主义话语的内部差别。同时也反映了中国人类学早期学术研究的发展脉络，即从“业余”的传教式研究逐渐发展成“科学”的学术研究的历程。

Abstract: Based on the comparative analysis of the studies made by Thomas Torrance and David Crockett Graham, which were about the Qiang people living in the upper reaches of the Min River, this paper reveals the specific studies on the ethnic minorities in southwest China carried out by mis- sionaries and anthropologistsin the early 20th century and the internal diversity in the discourse of Ori- entalism. Meanwhile, it also reflects the intersection of two different academic perspectives about southwest China at that time, as well as the history of the developing context of Chinese anthropologi- cal research in its early stage, which gradually developed from the ＂amateur＇ missionary research to the ＇scientific＇ academic research.

关键词：羌民;陶然士;葛维汉;西南视野;

作者：卞思梅(挪威奥斯陆大学社会人类学系)

来源： 《云南师范大学学报：哲学社会科学版》 2013年 第3期

中图分类号：K287.4;K289