内容摘要： 多元文化被理解为哲学，这一哲学可以解释族群权利和政府随之采取的保护和增强族群身份的公共政策，但这一多元文化在欧洲移民融合的辩论中只引起很小反响。当然基于与影响荷兰和德国移民的政策制定者的谈话，我们认为，多元文化仍然是一个现实的问题，因为它被理解为可以解决问题的实践，政府通过这一实践承认少数民族和宗教群体，与他们一道处理具有双重关切的问题，特别是带有性别特点的问题。我们将这一做法贴上“多元文化治理”的标签并确信，这种治理可以支持融合政策的基本目标：将移民向着占优势的民族语言、规范和制度的社会化转化。

Abstract: Understood as a philosophy counseling group rights and concomitant public policies undertaken by governments to preserve and enhance group identities, multiculturalism has little purchase in European immigrant integration debates. However, based on interviews with various actors engaged in policies that affect immigrants in the Netherlands and Germany, we argue that multiculturalism remains a going concern if it is understood as a problem –solving practice through which governments acknowledge and work with ethnic and religious groups to address issues of mutual concern, particularly on issues related to gender. We label this ‘multicultural governance’ and argue that it supports the principal ends of integration policy: the socialization of immigrants into prevailing national languages, norms and institutions.

关键词：多元文化，融合政策，德国，荷兰，族裔辨识，治理;

Keyword:multiculturalism, integration policy, Germany, the Netherlands, group recognition, governance;

作者：周学文(译)(中国社会科学院民族学与人类学研究所,)

来源： 《Ethnic and Racial Studies,201504》 第5期