内容摘要： 移居和差别性流动怎样适应当地水平是一个棘手的问题。规划和执行这些移居和差别化流动的当地政府所采用的概念和城市容量受到了越来越多的关注，但是，在当地观念和实践之下的思想和规范常常没有经过检验。本文评估了地方层面实用主义的假说，该假说拒绝了实用主义，但发展出“范例实用主义”的概念来刻画地方级政治怎样处理差别性流动。基于从阿姆斯特丹、安特卫普和利兹得到的经验证据，并比较了“多样性政治”的内容和实施，我提出反对实用主义 VS 理想主义政治的二分法。替而代之的是，这些城市利用不同的思想，并把它们务实地结合到多样性的标题下。这个范例实用主义要求对移民政策思想潜在的不兼容性所带来的影响做进一步研究。
 

Abstract: How migration and mobilizations of difference are accommodated at the local level is a burning question. Concepts adopted by local governments and the capacities of cities to formulate and implement these have received increasing attention, but often without examining the ideas and norms that underlie local concepts and practices. This article assesses the hypothesis of local-level pragmatism, which it rejects, and develops the notion of ‘paradigmatic pragmatism’ to characterize how local-level politics address mobilization of difference. Based on empirical findings from Amsterdam, Antwerp and Leeds, and comparing the content and the implementation of ‘diversity politics’, I argue against a dichotomy of pragmatic VS ideational politics. Instead, these cities draw on a variety of ideas and pragmatically combine them under the header of diversity. This paradigmatic pragmatism invites further research on the effects of potential incompatibilities of immigrant policy ideas.
 

关键词：当地，整合，城市，模型，多元文化，同化;

Keyword:local, integration, cities, model;

作者：Maria Schiller, 周学文(翻译)(中国社会科学院民族学与人类学研究所,)

来源： 《Ethnic and Racial Studies, June 2015》